"Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (incl. "DB Minus")

Discussion regarding the entirety of the franchise in a general (meta) sense, including such aspects as: production, trends, merchandise, fan culture, and more.

Moderators: General Help, Kanzenshuu Staff

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Sat Apr 05, 2014 4:40 pm

Zombie wrote:But EoB does reference the movie and that for me is enough to kick it out of the canon.
It references characters designed by Toriyama, and it's opening scene is also part of the manga.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not an EoB or Bardock fan-boy that is desperate to make this canon (I've mixed feelings for EoB & SS Bardock). It's just the fact that a) It's a manga from Ooishi, b) It was covered in the manga guidebook Chozenshuu #1, and c) It's latest volume release is modeled as if it's an extra volume of the original manga. These things make me uncomfortable to not consider it manga canon when nothing contradicts it.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

User avatar
FortuneSSJ
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5818
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 9:07 pm

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by FortuneSSJ » Sat Apr 05, 2014 6:23 pm

*Back to Kanzenshuu*

Already saw many shots from Gine. Definitely one of the most beautiful women in the series.
But this new Toriyama art style for DB is just meh. I dont like how most of the caracters are skinny.
A world without Dragon Ball is just meh.

ACCloud
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 7:39 am
Location: Australia

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by ACCloud » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:10 pm

Well, from reading the synopsis' that people have put up here, I am honestly a bit disappointed that Toriyama chose to override the Bardock special and do a rather different story. I don't think it helps that he only has one chapter to do the whole thing.

With that said, I'll probably still enjoy reading it, and just consider it an alternative take on a great story.
But I think the original special will remain in my 'canon' for the DB universe, because it's just a more interesting and fleshed-out take on the Saiyans in my opinion :D

RocktheDragon
Regular
Posts: 586
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 7:03 pm
Location: North Orange County, California
Contact:

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by RocktheDragon » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:27 pm

Blade wrote:You know - normally I'm pretty disparaging towards over-protective fans that take issue against creators going back and revising, or changing elements of their creation. My usual thought is: 'like it or not - the guy who wrote the story, who created the characters, has total discretion over the universe they have fashioned. It's their ball game, it's their rules - deal with it', but when it comes to Toriyama dipping back into Dragonball? I'm starting to have grave misgivings.

George Lucas' more recent forays into the Star Wars Universe are often brought up as a comparable situation, but frankly, I think it's totally different. Lucas' changes are just unpopular - but his love, passion and knowledge of the universe he created is hard to doubt. Toriyama on the other hand? Not even remotely similar. He's long since passed the point where he has any passion towards his work. What he hasn't forgotten about the Dragonball Universe and its characters, he simply doesn't care enough about to look back into thoroughly enough to not risk uprooting it. He's not remotely bothered about how his revisions and additions effect and contradict previously established elements - and I think that's unfair on the fans of the work, who have made him incredibly rich and given him a wonderful quality of life, and frankly deserve a little more respect.

If he's going to occasionally give in to these flights of fancy that lead to things such as Jaco, he should at least approach the work with due regard and consideration. We all know he's a pretty light headed, easy going guy - and we know that such an approach to his work gave Dragonball its unmistakeable tone - but sometimes you have to have the self respect to reflect on your past work and think: "do I really have the care and passion to do my life's work justice by dipping back into it at this point?".

Let it be.
Yup. I think you did a very good job at summarizing why Dragon Ball Minus is so underwhelming, and for a variety of reasons too.

I'd love to hear Akira Toriyama's own thought process on why he decided to make Dragon Ball Minus another alternative take on events that have already been covered. I'd just like to hear what his state of mind was for writing this, or if he was basically just kind of told to write about this specifically due to the publisher's request.
Kyle Broflovski wrote:It's all real. Think about it. Haven't Luke Skywalker and Santa Claus affected your lives more than most real people in this room? I mean, whether Jesus is real or not, he - he's had a bigger impact on the world than any of us have. And the same can be said for Bugs Bunny and - and Superman and Harry Potter. They've changed my life - changed the way I act on the earth. Doesn't that make them kind of real? They might be imaginary but, but they're more important than most of us here. And they're all gonna be around here long after we're dead. So, in a way, those things are more realer than any of us.

User avatar
Mewzard
I Live Here
Posts: 2009
Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 9:02 pm
Location: Oklahoma
Contact:

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by Mewzard » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:36 pm

Well, as the creator, he's free to tell the events of something if he so chooses to, and if they contradict something done by an anime adaptation or a side story by another creator, I'd say what he says goes over their works.

Whether it's for the best or not is up to the individual to decide based on their preferences.
RIDER KIIIIIIICK!

RocktheDragon
Regular
Posts: 586
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 7:03 pm
Location: North Orange County, California
Contact:

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by RocktheDragon » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:42 pm

Mewzard wrote:Well, as the creator, he's free to tell the events of something if he so chooses to, and if they contradict something done by an anime adaptation or a side story by another creator, I'd say what he says goes over their works.

Whether it's for the best or not is up to the individual to decide based on their preferences.
I have no problem with what Toriyama decides to do, but I would really like to know if this was his original idea, or if he was just kind of coerced into doing it.

I guess what I'm saying is, if he really just thought this would be a fun one chapter story to produce on a series he is not likely to work on again, then I'd feel a bit better about the whole Dragon Ball Minus scenario in general. But then again, if he really was kind of given parameters in giving us this specific story about Bardock, I don't think he'd even say so explicitly.
Kyle Broflovski wrote:It's all real. Think about it. Haven't Luke Skywalker and Santa Claus affected your lives more than most real people in this room? I mean, whether Jesus is real or not, he - he's had a bigger impact on the world than any of us have. And the same can be said for Bugs Bunny and - and Superman and Harry Potter. They've changed my life - changed the way I act on the earth. Doesn't that make them kind of real? They might be imaginary but, but they're more important than most of us here. And they're all gonna be around here long after we're dead. So, in a way, those things are more realer than any of us.

User avatar
Zephyr
I Live Here
Posts: 4043
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2010 9:20 pm

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by Zephyr » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:47 pm

Not digging the art style, but I always love new additions to the mythos.

And no, Toriyama very minisculely expanding the backstory of a couple of characters doesn't mean he's removing all of their "mystique". For every single thing he depicted in DB-, there's an infinite number of things he didn't depict. There's still plenty that we're in the dark about, plenty of mystery to marvel at, like how

User avatar
KentalSSJ6
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 6473
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 8:03 am
Location: Chicago, Illinois.

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by KentalSSJ6 » Sat Apr 05, 2014 8:05 pm

Zephyr wrote:Not digging the art style, but I always love new additions to the mythos.

And no, Toriyama very minisculely expanding the backstory of a couple of characters doesn't mean he's removing all of their "mystique". For every single thing he depicted in DB-, there's an infinite number of things he didn't depict. There's still plenty that we're in the dark about, plenty of mystery to marvel at, like how
*Cough* Makaioshin *Cough*
Deviantart (NSFW) - http://yamato012.deviantart.com/
DBSW Group Page - http://dbsw.deviantart.com/
Still the 1k Sniper - [spoiler]http://orig10.deviantart.net/6a02/f/201 ... 8npe7r.png[/spoiler]

User avatar
ZombieVito
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5912
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:18 pm

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by ZombieVito » Sat Apr 05, 2014 8:09 pm

DBZGTKOSDH wrote:
Zombie wrote:But EoB does reference the movie and that for me is enough to kick it out of the canon.
It references characters designed by Toriyama, and it's opening scene is also part of the manga.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not an EoB or Bardock fan-boy that is desperate to make this canon (I've mixed feelings for EoB & SS Bardock). It's just the fact that a) It's a manga from Ooishi, b) It was covered in the manga guidebook Chozenshuu #1, and c) It's latest volume release is modeled as if it's an extra volume of the original manga. These things make me uncomfortable to not consider it manga canon when nothing contradicts it.
Why did they add to include that scene at the end when he remembers his crew :( . That alone is a huge plothole if we include EoB to the canon.

User avatar
Luso Saiyan
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1479
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:33 am
Location: Portugal

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by Luso Saiyan » Sat Apr 05, 2014 8:21 pm

Zombie wrote:Why did they add to include that scene at the end when he remembers his crew :( . That alone is a huge plothole if we include EoB to the canon.
How exactly is that a plothole?

User avatar
ZombieVito
Born 'n Bred Here
Posts: 5912
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:18 pm

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by ZombieVito » Sat Apr 05, 2014 8:33 pm

They are nowhere to be seen in DB- (Bardock even has a completely different crew) and why would Bardock remember them and not Gine (yes I know EoB was first but still).

The other flashback Bardock has can fit since it's not the same as the movie (They are other Saiyans there). That scene can actually be in Vegeta. The last one truly blew it.

Neon Z
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1145
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 11:34 am

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by Neon Z » Sat Apr 05, 2014 9:13 pm

Well, if we attempt to look at Episode of Bardock completely separately from the anime, those Saiyans could just have been some Saiyans that he saw being killed by Freeza's men before Vegeta's destruction, not necessarily part of his team. I mean, although he reminisces them, EoB itself gives not context to them if you ignore the anime.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sat Apr 05, 2014 10:00 pm

Yeah... this, along with BOG, pretty much seals it for me. I don't want Toriyana involved on the next project.

I mean, was this really necessary? What was gained from retconning the special and pretty much Bardock's entire character?
Fortunately that's not true.
Yes, it is.
Last edited by RandomGuy96 on Sun Apr 06, 2014 4:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.


User avatar
TheDevilsCorpse
Moderator
Posts: 11378
Joined: Sun Jun 20, 2010 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by TheDevilsCorpse » Sat Apr 05, 2014 11:06 pm

hulkty wrote:Any English translation yet?
No, why would there be? The official English version of the chapter is out in like 36 hours.

User avatar
MagicBox
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1476
Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 6:09 pm
Location: On The Forums... Duh!
Contact:

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by MagicBox » Sun Apr 06, 2014 12:04 am

Blade wrote:George Lucas' more recent forays into the Star Wars Universe are often brought up as a comparable situation, but frankly, I think it's totally different. Lucas' changes are just unpopular - but his love, passion and knowledge of the universe he created is hard to doubt. Toriyama on the other hand? Not even remotely similar. He's long since passed the point where he has any passion towards his work.
I actually disagree. If anything, I think this past year or so has proven that a lot of his "passion" (if you can call it that with a guy like Toriyama) has actually returned. In 1995, he couldn't get away from Dragon Ball fast enough. In the early 2000s, he had distanced himself from it enough to tolerate playfully revisiting the world and characters (Neko Majin). And now, in the 2010s, he seems to have gotten to the point where he actually likes the series again. It's been an interesting transformation to watch.

I hate to give the impression that I'm just blindly following the author, because I'm not that kind of fan. But I honestly, truly don't see what's wrong with what Toriyama is doing here. What exactly is he contradicting by writing this story? Burdock appeared in two panels of the manga. All we know from those two panels is that he 1.) confronts Freeza in space with damaged armor and a headband, 2.) that he seems to have been blown up by Freeza in his first form, and 3.) that he "resisted to the very end." All of that is still very much possible now that Dragon Ball Minus exists. Burdock can love his wife and kids and still be the cold-blooded warrior that fans love. His character isn't ruined. The problem is that people keep trying to drag the animated stuff into this.

So what if he contradicts the first TV special? So what if he contradicts a fanfic by Naho Ooishi that's almost universally hated? Fans of Tōma, Sleypa, and the others don't have to go nuts just because they don't appear in this short, short story. I hesitate to use the dreaded c-word, but it's general consensus among the fanbase that the manga "canon" doesn't always line up with the cartoon "canon." I see no reason why Toriyama shouldn't be allowed to do his own thing with a character that he's never touched before. That said, I am a little annoyed that Goku's age contradicts what we learn about him during the 21st Tenkaichi Tournament. And Freeza knowing about Super Saiyan God makes no sense. Toriyama should get a slap on the wrist for crap like that. But the Burdock stuff? He's doing nothing wrong.
"Magic's Detective Agency" - The Ultimate Guide to Changes in Detective Conan

"Magic's DiGiMONMUSiC Database" - The Ultimate Guide to Digimon CDs

User avatar
auspx
Not-So-Newbie
Posts: 88
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 10:12 pm
Location: New York

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by auspx » Sun Apr 06, 2014 2:38 am

MagicBox wrote:
Blade wrote: ...That said, I am a little annoyed that Goku's age contradicts what we learn about him during the 21st Tenkaichi Tournament. And Freeza knowing about Super Saiyan God makes no sense. Toriyama should get a slap on the wrist for crap like that. But the Burdock stuff? He's doing nothing wrong.
He says that he is 12 years old. He could have been 13. There's almost no physical difference between a 12 year old and a 13 year old. I don't see a problem here and it never made sense that Goku knew how old he was anyway. He lost his memory. He had no birth certificate. He looked like an overweight toddler. Goku didn't really begin to look "normal" for his age until the 23rd Martial Arts Tournament.

User avatar
DBZGTKOSDH
Namekian Warrior
Posts: 12401
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
Location: Greece

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by DBZGTKOSDH » Sun Apr 06, 2014 4:36 am

Zombie wrote:They are nowhere to be seen in DB-
So were Nappa & King Vegeta, but that doesn't mean that they don't exist.
(Bardock even has a completely different crew)
It doesn't sound like Bardock has a crew he always goes around. Toriyama said that Gine was part of a 4-person team, so it seems that the Saiyans form different teams depending on the mission.
James Teal (Animerica 1996) wrote:When you think about it, there are a number of similarities between the Chinese-inspired Son Goku and that most American of superhero icons, Superman. Both are aliens sent to Earth shortly after birth to escape the destruction of their homeworlds; both possess super-strength, flight, super-speed, heightened senses and the ability to cast energy blasts. But the crucial difference between them lies not only in how they view the world, but in how the world views them.

Superman is, and always has been, a symbol for truth, justice, and upstanding moral fortitude–a role model and leader as much as a fighter. The more down-to-earth Goku has no illusions about being responsible for maintaining social order, or for setting some kind of moral example for the entire world. Goku is simply a martial artist who’s devoted his life toward perfecting his fighting skills and other abilities. Though never shy about risking his life to save either one person or the entire world, he just doesn’t believe that the balance of the world rests in any way on his shoulders, and he has no need to shape any part of it in his image. Goku is an idealist, and believes that there is some good in everyone, but he is unconcerned with the big picture of the world…unless it has to do with some kind of fight. Politics, society, law and order don’t have much bearing on his life, but he’s a man who knows right from wrong.

User avatar
RandomGuy96
Kicks it Old-School
Posts: 8862
Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:57 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by RandomGuy96 » Sun Apr 06, 2014 4:59 am

Well, at least it's better than Bardock being sent back in time to become the legendary Super Saiyan. But not much better.
I actually think EOB was (barley) better than this.
The Monkey King wrote:
RandomGuy96 wrote:
dbgtFO wrote: Please elaborate as I do not know what you mean by "pushing Vegeta's destruction"
He's probably referring to the Bardock special. Zarbon was the one who first recommended destroying Planet Vegeta because the saiyans were rapidly growing in strength.
It was actually Beerus disguised as Zarbon #StayWoke
Herms wrote:The fact that the ridiculous power inflation is presented so earnestly makes me just roll my eyes and snicker. Like with Freeza, where he starts off over 10 times stronger than all his henchmen except Ginyu (because...well, just because), then we find out he can transform and get even more powerful, and then he reveals he can transform two more times, before finally coming out with the fact that he hasn't even been using anywhere near 50% of his power. Oh, and he can survive in the vacuum of space. All this stuff is just presented as the way Freeza is, without even an attempt at rationalizing it, yet the tone dictates we're supposed to take all this silly grasping at straws as thrilling danger. So I guess I don't really take the power inflation in the Boo arc seriously, but I don't take the power inflation in earlier arcs seriously either, so there's no net loss of seriousness. I think a silly story presented as serious is harder to accept than a silly story presented as silly.

User avatar
Luso Saiyan
Advanced Regular
Posts: 1479
Joined: Wed Sep 25, 2013 10:33 am
Location: Portugal

Re: "Jaco the Galactic Patrolman" discussion (Tankōbon April

Post by Luso Saiyan » Sun Apr 06, 2014 5:16 am

Zombie wrote:They are nowhere to be seen in DB- (Bardock even has a completely different crew)
Bardock isn't shown with a crew to begin with, only with one Saiyan. And there is still one month between the events of Minus and the TV special.
Zombie wrote:and why would Bardock remember them and not Gine (yes I know EoB was first but still).
Yes, his personality is different, but it's not necessarily a plothole.
Zombie wrote:The other flashback Bardock has can fit since it's not the same as the movie (They are other Saiyans there).
What flashback? The only one he has is of his team he failed to save.
RandomGuy96 wrote:Yes, it is.
Whatever...

Post Reply